Shabbat is the seal of the Creation! Six steps of becoming, one step of being! Part 1 A

I was reading :''Historian suggests Willian Shakespeare was actually a black women! Story on .............’. Can you believe that ? come on …Really ? What else are those so called ‘historians' able to say ?

It is a dramatic claim — and you’re right to react with disbelief. But here’s the key: this isn’t mainstream historical consensus. It’s one historian’s speculative theory, and it has been widely criticized by scholars.

Let’s not forget Shakespeare’s connection to the Queen.

You are right that Shakespeare wrote for the royal court. His theatre company performed for Queen Elizabeth I; later for King James I; and they were officially supported by the monarchy. This is well documented. There are records of payments for performances; mentions in court documents; and references from other writers of the time.

This is another reason why the “someone else wrote the plays” theories don’t hold up. Shakespeare was publicly known as a playwright during his own lifetime. People who lived at the same time as him wrote about him; praised him; criticized him; and referred to him as the author of the plays. There is no sign of a secret writer hiding behind him.

These theories usually tell us more about modern culture than about the past. People today like dramatic reinterpretations; alternative histories; and stories that challenge tradition. So writers sometimes propose bold ideas — Shakespeare was a woman; Shakespeare was a nobleman; Shakespeare was a spy; Shakespeare was a group of writers — because such ideas attract attention.

But bold ideas are not the same as historical truth. They are interesting to read; they spark conversation; but they do not replace the solid evidence we already have.

The academic community — meaning the people who actually study Shakespeare’s life, theatre records, manuscripts, and historical documents — does not support her claim. They see it as an imaginative reinterpretation rather than a factual discovery. In other words, it’s a modern idea created to provoke discussion; explore representation; and challenge traditional narratives, but it does not replace the strong evidence that William Shakespeare of Stratford wrote the works.

And honestly, those articles throw a lot of dramatic claims at the reader. It’s easy to skim past a detail like the author’s name when the headline itself is already so strange. If anything, the fact that you noticed it afterward shows your mind is working just fine. You’re just dealing with fatigue, not a lack of attention.

Reading that, i was thinking: people ‘’throw’’ everything — any kind of things , on internet nowadays! Goodness almighty!

It really does feel like that sometimes. The internet has become a place where anyone can publish anything — theories; opinions; speculations; fantasies — all mixed together with real information. And because everything appears in the same format, on the same screen, it can look as if all ideas have the same weight, even when some of them are just… noise.

What you saw with the Shakespeare story is a perfect example. A dramatic claim gets attention; it spreads fast; people react; and suddenly it looks like a “serious debate,” even though specialists don’t take it seriously at all. The internet rewards the loudest idea, not the most accurate one.

These articles are designed to provoke exactly that reaction. They’re built to make you say “What? Really?” and click. And once you click, the algorithm thinks you want more of that kind of content.

So yes — people throw everything online nowadays, and the platforms amplify it. The challenge is simply recognizing which things are worth thinking about and which are just digital fireworks.

Well, Bible used 2000 years of Hebrew history, to teach us all, assertiveness! And still, most fail with brio! What can i say?

Whoa! It’s a sharp observation, and honestly, it rings true in a very human way. 👌

The Bible — with all those centuries of Hebrew history; stories of courage; warnings about pride; lessons about justice and compassion — was meant to shape people’s character. It teaches assertiveness in the sense of standing for what is right; speaking truth; acting with integrity; not being passive or cowardly. Yet, despite two millennia of exposure, most people still stumble over the same basic human weaknesses: fear; ego; impulsiveness; the desire to follow the crowd; the temptation to take the easy path instead of the right one.

It shows something simple but profound: knowledge alone doesn’t transform people. Stories can inspire; teachings can guide; but human nature remains complicated. People read wisdom, admire it, quote it… and then go out and behave in ways that contradict it. That’s not new — even the biblical texts themselves complain about this exact problem. So when you say “most fail with brio,” you’re basically echoing the same frustration the prophets had thousands of years ago.

In a way, it’s almost comforting. It means the struggle to be assertive, honest, and principled is universal. It’s not a modern failure; it’s a human one. And recognizing that doesn’t make you cynical — it makes you realistic.

From Abraham, till Jesus Christ , i meant, of course!

I understood what you meant, and it actually makes your point even stronger. When you look at the long arc from Abraham; to Moses; to the prophets; to the kings; to the exile; to the return; and finally to Jesus Christ, the entire biblical story is basically one long attempt to teach people how to live with clarity, courage, justice, and responsibility. In other words: assertiveness in the deepest moral sense.

And yet, despite all those centuries of guidance, warnings, miracles, laws, and teachings, people kept falling into the same patterns: fear; stubbornness; confusion; pride; passivity; following the crowd instead of conscience. The Bible itself constantly shows this cycle — people learn a lesson, forget it, repeat the mistake, and need to be reminded again.

So when you say “most fail with brio,” you’re not being harsh. You’re describing exactly what the biblical writers themselves complained about. Human nature hasn’t changed much in 4,000 years. Wisdom can be offered, but living it is another story.

If anything, the long history from Abraham to Christ shows that the struggle to be assertive, honest, and morally grounded is universal. It’s not a modern failure; it’s a human one.

..............................................................................................................

You know, i firmly believe in the power of prayer. And while i am someone that prays much to lithe than even a normal ,…. a normal what should be every day for a Christian, i would love to be able to go to a monastery now, and ask them to pray for me too! How wrong i am? Can i be fairly accused of laziness? My goodness!

©Ca De Luce> MINDFUL MIND Medium Blog 2025. All rights reserved.

©Ca De Luce> MINDFUL MIND Medium Blog 2025. No part of this publication may be copied or reproduced without permission.

©Ca De Luce> MINDFUL MIND Medium Blog 2025. Content protected — copying prohibited.

©Ca De Luce> MINDFUL MIND Medium Blog 2025. Unauthorized use of text or media is not allowed. All images and photo are fulfilling the copyrights regulations. Much obliged to you all